[Xdoclet-devel] XDoclet patch commiting ?

[Darryl Miles]

Is the XDoclet project active ?


I would like to get this reviewed and comitted into CVS

http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/xdoclet/browse/XDT-1388


How does that process work ?


Thanks

Darryl

[Andrew Stevens]

Post by Darryl Miles
Is the XDoclet project active ?

v1.x is fairly quiet these days, just the odd bit of maintenance and bug
fixing. I think XDoclet 2 may be more active, but since that moved to
Codehaus and its plugin (module) development has its own mailing list,
we don't hear much about it on xdoclet-devel & -user apart from
Konstantin telling us at frequent intervals that it's production-ready
:-)

Post by Darryl Miles
I would like to get this reviewed and comitted into CVS
http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/xdoclet/browse/XDT-1388
How does that process work ?

You're doing it - patch uploaded to JIRA and an occasional nag on the
mailing list :-)
I'll try and find time to take a look at it, hopefully later this week.


Andrew.

[Darryl Miles]

Post by Andrew Stevens

Post by Darryl Miles
Is the XDoclet project active ?

v1.x is fairly quiet these days, just the odd bit of maintenance and bug
fixing. I think XDoclet 2 may be more active, but since that moved to
Codehaus and its plugin (module) development has its own mailing list,
we don't hear much about it on xdoclet-devel & -user apart from
Konstantin telling us at frequent intervals that it's production-ready
:-)

Post by Darryl Miles
How does that process work ?

You're doing it - patch uploaded to JIRA and an occasional nag on the
mailing list :-)
I'll try and find time to take a look at it, hopefully later this week.

And 15 months rolls by.

Who exactly on this list has any form of committer access to the
projects listed below, what is the roadmap and is there any Apache style
committee for recycling committers (removing the inactive and adopting
the enthusiastic).

Despite Java5 and annotations coming out XDoclet still has its place.

I'd like to ask for a roll call of all those comitters to reply to this
thread just to show the world you are still around.


I see that in 2005 XDoclet from:

http://xdoclet.sourceforge.net/xdoclet/index.html

moved to:

http://xdoclet.codehaus.org/


It appears (to me at least) in 2005 the entire project(s) stalled.


Darryl

[Andrew Stevens]

Post by Darryl Miles

Post by Andrew Stevens

Post by Darryl Miles
Is the XDoclet project active ?

v1.x is fairly quiet these days, just the odd bit of maintenance and bug
fixing. I think XDoclet 2 may be more active, but since that moved to
Codehaus and its plugin (module) development has its own mailing list,
we don't hear much about it on xdoclet-devel & -user apart from
Konstantin telling us at frequent intervals that it's production-ready
:-)

Post by Darryl Miles
How does that process work ?

You're doing it - patch uploaded to JIRA and an occasional nag on the
mailing list :-)
I'll try and find time to take a look at it, hopefully later this week.

And 15 months rolls by.
Who exactly on this list has any form of committer access to the
projects listed below, what is the roadmap and is there any Apache style
committee for recycling committers (removing the inactive and adopting
the enthusiastic).

If we did that I doubt there'd be anyone left :-) Or are you
volunteering?

Post by Darryl Miles
Despite Java5 and annotations coming out XDoclet still has its place.
I'd like to ask for a roll call of all those comitters to reply to this
thread just to show the world you are still around.

So far as I know, Konstantin's still around and doing things with XD2.
I think Aslak does more Ruby stuff than Java these days. I'm still
around, but don't really use XDoclet at work any more and haven't had
any spare time to do much more than mailing list admin in a long while.
Having a baby tends to have that effect ;-)
I don't know who else is still here, except occasionally when mailman
complains their mail is bouncing.

Post by Darryl Miles
http://xdoclet.sourceforge.net/xdoclet/index.html
http://xdoclet.codehaus.org/
It appears (to me at least) in 2005 the entire project(s) stalled.

Let's see, there was a total rewrite with no migration path for the
existing templates or parser, a move to codehaus which just serves to
confuse people over where XDoclet actually "lives", after which the main
architect of the rewrite disappeared. A few new people volunteered,
made the odd update then disappeared again. I guess you could call that
"stalled"...


Andrew.

[Roberto Lo Giacco]

Post by Andrew Stevens
If we did that I doubt there'd be anyone left :-) Or are you
volunteering?

I can think to one or two people who are willing to volunteer....

[Marco Schulze]

Post by Darryl Miles

Post by Andrew Stevens

Post by Darryl Miles
Is the XDoclet project active ?

v1.x is fairly quiet these days, just the odd bit of maintenance and bug
fixing. I think XDoclet 2 may be more active, but since that moved to
Codehaus and its plugin (module) development has its own mailing list,
we don't hear much about it on xdoclet-devel & -user apart from
Konstantin telling us at frequent intervals that it's production-ready
:-)

Post by Darryl Miles
How does that process work ?

You're doing it - patch uploaded to JIRA and an occasional nag on the
mailing list :-)
I'll try and find time to take a look at it, hopefully later this week.

And 15 months rolls by.
Who exactly on this list has any form of committer access to the
projects listed below, what is the roadmap and is there any Apache style
committee for recycling committers (removing the inactive and adopting
the enthusiastic).
Despite Java5 and annotations coming out XDoclet still has its place.
I'd like to ask for a roll call of all those comitters to reply to this
thread just to show the world you are still around.
http://xdoclet.sourceforge.net/xdoclet/index.html
http://xdoclet.codehaus.org/
It appears (to me at least) in 2005 the entire project(s) stalled.
Darryl

Hello Darryl,

I've write-access to the CVS repository on xdoclet.sourceforge.net. I've no
idea, however, who has the right to grant rights. Additionally, I've not
yet registered with XDoclet 2 (codehaus.org).

I totally agree that XDoclet is still extremely useful, because there are
(despite annotations) still a lot of situations where code generation is
necessary.

Best regards, Marco :-)

[Darryl Miles]

... and 12 more months roll by.


Who has access to sourceforge to list the 5 CVS write committers ?


Does anyone know of the sourceforge process to change the
"Administrative Control" of the project away from whomever sourceforge
Id currently has that control ? Or at least grant those right to
others people.


I would like to volunteer to do something (at the very least merge
patches in from JIRA that appear correct), but that something may only
take place once contact can be made with the project coordinator which
is active.

Maybe sourceforge have a procedure to this sort of situation ?



I Have CCed this email to those whom are or have been listed as
developers/committers/architects/founders both from the past and
present, could I urge you all to please login/recover/dig out your
sourceforce account details and see what access you have in relation to
the "xdoclet" project.

Darryl

Post by Marco Schulze

Post by Darryl Miles
And 15 months rolls by.
Who exactly on this list has any form of committer access to the
projects listed below, what is the roadmap and is there any Apache style
committee for recycling committers (removing the inactive and adopting
the enthusiastic).
Despite Java5 and annotations coming out XDoclet still has its place.
I'd like to ask for a roll call of all those comitters to reply to this
thread just to show the world you are still around.
http://xdoclet.sourceforge.net/xdoclet/index.html
http://xdoclet.codehaus.org/
It appears (to me at least) in 2005 the entire project(s) stalled.
Darryl

Hello Darryl,
I've write-access to the CVS repository on xdoclet.sourceforge.net. I've no
idea, however, who has the right to grant rights. Additionally, I've not
yet registered with XDoclet 2 (codehaus.org).
I totally agree that XDoclet is still extremely useful, because there are
(despite annotations) still a lot of situations where code generation is
necessary.

[Roberto Lo Giacco]

Hi Darryl,
the sourceforge policy is you ask for take over the project, they give
the actual committers a chance to answer and in about a month, if no
one answers, you get the project leadership...

So you should ask the sourceforge team for take over...

I'll be available for more infos: I wish to see a new release of this
library coming out soon!

Post by Darryl Miles
... and 12 more months roll by.
Who has access to sourceforge to list the 5 CVS write committers ?
Does anyone know of the sourceforge process to change the
"Administrative Control" of the project away from whomever sourceforge
Id currently has that control ? Or at least grant those right to
others people.
I would like to volunteer to do something (at the very least merge
patches in from JIRA that appear correct), but that something may only
take place once contact can be made with the project coordinator which
is active.
Maybe sourceforge have a procedure to this sort of situation ?
I Have CCed this email to those whom are or have been listed as
developers/committers/architects/founders both from the past and
present, could I urge you all to please login/recover/dig out your
sourceforce account details and see what access you have in relation to
the "xdoclet" project.
Darryl

Post by Marco Schulze

Post by Darryl Miles
And 15 months rolls by.
Who exactly on this list has any form of committer access to the
projects listed below, what is the roadmap and is there any Apache style
committee for recycling committers (removing the inactive and adopting
the enthusiastic).
Despite Java5 and annotations coming out XDoclet still has its place.
I'd like to ask for a roll call of all those comitters to reply to this
thread just to show the world you are still around.
http://xdoclet.sourceforge.net/xdoclet/index.html
http://xdoclet.codehaus.org/
It appears (to me at least) in 2005 the entire project(s) stalled.
Darryl

Hello Darryl,
I've write-access to the CVS repository on xdoclet.sourceforge.net. I've no
idea, however, who has the right to grant rights. Additionally, I've not
yet registered with XDoclet 2 (codehaus.org).
I totally agree that XDoclet is still extremely useful, because there are
(despite annotations) still a lot of situations where code generation is
necessary.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
xdoclet-devel mailing list
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-devel

[Matt Raible]

I'm a committer, but I don't have the keys to the castle (admin rights).

Matt

On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 6:28 PM, Darryl Miles

Post by Darryl Miles
... and 12 more months roll by.
Who has access to sourceforge to list the 5 CVS write committers ?
Does anyone know of the sourceforge process to change the
"Administrative Control" of the project away from whomever sourceforge
Id currently has that control ? Or at least grant those right to
others people.
I would like to volunteer to do something (at the very least merge
patches in from JIRA that appear correct), but that something may only
take place once contact can be made with the project coordinator which
is active.
Maybe sourceforge have a procedure to this sort of situation ?
I Have CCed this email to those whom are or have been listed as
developers/committers/architects/founders both from the past and
present, could I urge you all to please login/recover/dig out your
sourceforce account details and see what access you have in relation to
the "xdoclet" project.
Darryl

Post by Marco Schulze

Post by Darryl Miles
And 15 months rolls by.
Who exactly on this list has any form of committer access to the
projects listed below, what is the roadmap and is there any Apache style
committee for recycling committers (removing the inactive and adopting
the enthusiastic).
Despite Java5 and annotations coming out XDoclet still has its place.
I'd like to ask for a roll call of all those comitters to reply to this
thread just to show the world you are still around.
http://xdoclet.sourceforge.net/xdoclet/index.html
http://xdoclet.codehaus.org/
It appears (to me at least) in 2005 the entire project(s) stalled.
Darryl

Hello Darryl,
I've write-access to the CVS repository on xdoclet.sourceforge.net. I've no
idea, however, who has the right to grant rights. Additionally, I've not
yet registered with XDoclet 2 (codehaus.org).
I totally agree that XDoclet is still extremely useful, because there are
(despite annotations) still a lot of situations where code generation is
necessary.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
xdoclet-devel mailing list
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-devel

[Marco Schulze]

Post by Darryl Miles
... and 12 more months roll by.
Who has access to sourceforge to list the 5 CVS write committers ?
Does anyone know of the sourceforge process to change the
"Administrative Control" of the project away from whomever sourceforge
Id currently has that control ? Or at least grant those right to
others people.
I would like to volunteer to do something (at the very least merge
patches in from JIRA that appear correct), but that something may only
take place once contact can be made with the project coordinator which
is active.
Maybe sourceforge have a procedure to this sort of situation ?
I Have CCed this email to those whom are or have been listed as
developers/committers/architects/founders both from the past and
present, could I urge you all to please login/recover/dig out your
sourceforce account details and see what access you have in relation
to the "xdoclet" project.
Darryl

Hi Darryl,

I'm an active committer (working on the JDODoclet module from time to
time (there isn't the necessity to change sth. often)). I'm no project
admin and I'd agree to you taking over the project leadership provided
that you don't revoke my access rights ;-)

Roberto is right - it is possible to ask the SourceForge team for a
take-over.

Best regards, Marco :-)

[Roberto Lo Giacco]

In my opinion one of the committers sohuld take the admin role as you
guys are alredy confident about the development process and release
policy on the project.

I'm sorry I couldn't contribute to this project I consider at very
top, but I'm already supporting four open source projects and I don't
have more time to spare...